Lessons from the Dakota Access Pipeline
Are Scientists Preparing for a FlipFlop Back to Global Cooling Predictions?
Earlier this month, the U.S. House of Representatives passed an anti-carbon-tax resolution – expressing concerns that a tax on carbon, applied to 85 percent of our nation’s energy, would be detrimental to the economy. Reports by the Congressional Budget Office and the National Association of Manufacturers reveals a carbon tax could eliminate 21 million jobs over the next 40 years. Additionally, CBO notes the tax would be highly regressive, harming the poorest American households the most. READ MORE
Prosecute Climate Deniers? No, First Amendment Protects Debate
Science Supports Public’s Rejection of Climate Change Hype
Who profits from a Green Energy Cartel? The Secret Power Elite
This also explains the need for Agenda 21 or 'sustainable development' to 'protect the environment')
Patrick Moore, the Heartlander
“The IPCC’s followers have given us a vision of a world dying because of carbon-dioxide emissions. I say the Earth would be a lot deader with no carbon dioxide, and more of it will be a very positive factor in feeding the world. Let’s celebrate carbon dioxide.” READ MORE
The Carbon Tax Scam
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is vital to all life on Earth, but most particularly to every piece of vegetation that grows on it. Top climatologists tell me it plays a very small role, if any, in Earth’s climate or weather. Why would anyone expect a gas that represents 400 parts per million of all atmospheric gases, barely 0.04% of all atmospheric gases, to have the capacity to affect something as huge and dynamic as the weather or climate?...READ MORE
Environment and Climate News - 2017
July Environment & Climate News: Trump Withdraws from Paris Climate Agreement
The July issue of Environment & Climate News reports on President Donald Trump’s June 1 announcement that the United States would withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. Joseph Bast, president of The Heartland Institute, praised the decision: “President Trump made exactly the right call by deciding to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate treaty,” said Bast. “Staying in would make it impossible to implement his America First Energy Plan and result in U.S. taxpayers and consumers paying hundreds of billions of dollars in higher taxes and higher energy costs, solely for the benefit of crony capitalists in the renewable-energy industry and Third World dictators.”
Also in this issue:
- Hydraulic fracturing, commonly called “fracking,” is not a major threat to drinking water, according to a new study financed in part by the antifracking Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).
- President Donald Trump issued an executive order that could open millions of offshore acres for oil and gas production.
- Texas officials and local business groups are fighting an EPA clean-up plan they fear will result in a toxic spill similar to the Gold King Mine disaster EPA caused.
- The Oregon House of Reps passed a bill placing a 10-year ban on fracking. Isaac Orr, a research fellow at The Heartland Institute, says the bill is “bad public policy, not based on science.”
- Three Republican senators joined the entire Democratic caucus in rejecting a bill rescinding Obama’s duplicative, expensive methane flaring rule.
All issues of Environment & Climate News are archived here: Environment & Climate News Issue Archive.
Twenty five years ago Presidential candidate Ross Perot secured 19% of the popular vote by discussing economic issues related to NAFTA, UN Agenda 21 Development Plan and the Kyoto Protocol. Perot supporters were labeled as angry nut-bags and nationalist for questioning multi-trillion dollar initiatives created in complete secrecy by the Global elites.
To be clear, original conspiracy theories concerned the media’s efforts to suppress all dialog regarding the politicians, business leaders and radical anti-Capitalist groups promoting a type of European Socialism for America. Media labeled American’s as angry knuckle-dragging bigots for rejecting their theories regarding Global Warming, while refusing to disclose any information on shadowy non-profit groups like the Energy Foundation which were producing the suspect science for government...MORE
The Real Purpose Behind Global Warming
The true environmental problem seems to be human breathing accounting for nearly half of the natural CO2 in the atmosphere exclusive of natural gas consumption and the automobile. Man is therefore viewed as an 'eco-cancer' by globalists and other crackpot scientists who presume the masses are destroying the earth. Yet there is NO evidence of significant temperature increases across the globe despite CO2 releases many times larger than the earth's natural carbon dioxide content. WHY? Because plants metabolize CO2 at faster rates and more limestone is formed according to the concentration driving force governed by reaction Kinetics.
Atmospheric equilibrium is maintained and once more the law of Conservation of Mass is vindicated. The Normal Plant Animal Cycle diagram depicts the carbon flow between plants and animals.
From Appendix C, we see that the Incident Air Volume over the U.S. at 1000 ft is 1.056 x 1015 ft3. But, lets examine the earth's atmospheric bottle at just 10 ft above grade for our chart purposes. Since CO2 occurs naturally in the atmosphere at approximately 0.04% by volume. CO2now. org indicates the Nov 2015 atmospheric CO2 concentration at 400.16 parts per million, normal variation within the 0.04% atmospheric concentration. So our atmospheric concentration per the chart is calculated as:
3,787,425 miles2 x (5,280 ft)2 / 1 mile2 x 10 ft above grade x 0.04% CO2 / ft3 of air = 4.22 x 1013 ft3 of CO2 at a 10 ft elevation in our chosen atmospheric bottle.
Appendix D shows the most significant man made sources of greenhouse gases. Note that the single largest contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gas is the industrial use of natural gas followed closely by the automobile. The war on fossil fuel has accomplished nothing more than to increase natural gas consumption. Now you know the underlying motive behind the de-industrialization of America and shipping manufacturing jobs overseas.
Most importantly, note that if both natural gas consumption and the automobile were totally eliminated, human breathing would be the dominant source of greenhouse gas as shown in the above chart. This is the underlying impetus for globalists to force the world's population down to around 1 billion people by any and all means available. ISIS Created by US & NATO T raining & Recruiting Jihadists is very likely one such means
Killing off vast numbers of the world's population is science Czar John Holdren's response to climate change in the 1977 book 'Ecoscience', co-authored by Holdren and colleagues Paul and Anne Ehrlich. Natural News has noted that ".. we've already seen shocking statements from many scientists about their desire to use genetically engineered viral strains to accomplish global depopulation goals." The 'final solution' is to kill vast numbers of the population to effect a three-fold reduction in carbon dioxide because fewer people use less gasoline and natural gas which translates to less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.